Helping Victims Get Justice
Injured After a Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant? We’re Reviewing Claims.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits for Device Failure and Lead Complications
Spinal cord stimulators are implanted devices used to interrupt pain signals for people living with chronic back pain, nerve pain, and related conditions. These systems rely on thin lead wires placed near the spinal cord to deliver electrical impulses. According to the referenced lawsuit page, many claims focus on whether certain devices failed because lead components fractured, shifted out of position, or otherwise malfunctioned after implantation.
When a spinal cord stimulator fails, the consequences can be serious. Reported complications described on the source page include worsening pain, painful electrical shocks, burns or tissue damage, loss of pain relief, and the need for revision surgery or full device removal. For many patients, that can mean more procedures, more medical bills, and more time dealing with pain that the implant was supposed to relieve.
Spinal cord stimulator litigation appears to be growing. The source page states that on February 20, 2026, a motion was filed asking the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate certain federal spinal cord stimulator cases involving Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific, with at least 15 related federal cases already pending at that time. If you experienced complications after implantation, Cornerstone Law can review your situation and help determine whether you may qualify to file a claim.
No Fees, Unless Recovery
Free Claim Review
We help you seek Justice & Compensation Due.
"*" indicates required fields
By submitting my request, I confirm that I have read and agree to the Privacy Statement and Terms of Service of this site and that I consent to receive emails, phone calls and/or text message offers and communications from Zeccola & Selinger LLC and at any telephone number or email address provided by me, including my wireless number if provided. I understand there may be a charge by my wireless carrier for such communications.I understand these communications may be generated using an autodialer and may contain pre-recorded messages and that consent is not required to utilize Consumer Help Center. I understand that this authorization overrides any previous registrations on a federal or state Do Not Call registry